Key result
Distinct HRV parameter sets distinguish cardiovascular patients from healthy controls and classify specific disease types.
Why the study?
Does feature selection in heart rate variability analysis improve the classification of different cardiovascular diseases?
Cross-Sectional
Does feature selection in heart rate variability analysis improve the classification of different cardiovascular diseases?
Different subsets of heart rate variability parameters are optimal for distinguishing healthy from diseased subjects versus classifying specific cardiovascular diseases.
HRV feature selection may aid disease classification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
In this study heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was applied to characterize patients suffering from coronary heart disease (CHD), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and patients who had survived an acute myocardial infarction (MI). On the basis of several HRV parameters, an optimal discrimination between the different kinds of cardiovascular diseases and between the diseases and healthy controls (HC) was derived by feature selection and linear classification. For each task a small favourable subset of a set of 33 potentially interesting HRV measures was selected with the intention of improving the diagnostic value and facilitating the physiological interpretation of HRV analysis. Time- and frequency-domain parameters as well as parameters from non-linear dynamics were included in the analysis. With the expectation that different diseases are characterized by different phenomena, feature selection was applied for each task separately. Using the features optimal for one task to another task can reveal a loss in performance, but it turned out that one specific parameter set (set1: normalized low frequency LF/P and a non-linear variability measure WPSUM13) was applicable for all tasks, where diseased and healthy subjects have to be distinguished, without significant reduction in performance. This set seems to be a general marker for pathologic changes in HRV and might be used for early detection of heart diseases. The classification between different heart diseases requires another parameter set (set2: meanNN and sdaNN, reflecting the steady state behaviour of the heart rate and long and short term SEAR describing the spectral composition). However, the use of set1 for the separation of different kinds of diseases, where set2 is appropriate, led to significant reduction in performance and vice versa. This observation may be important for future developments of HRV measures especially suitable for the assessment of disease severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schumann et al. (2002) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, and acute myocardial infarction survivors. Heart rate variability (HRV) feature selection vs. Healthy controls and between different diseases was evaluated on Discrimination between different cardiovascular diseases and healthy controls. A specific HRV parameter set (normalized LF/P and WPSUM13) distinguished diseased from healthy subjects, whereas a different set (meanNN, sdaNN, SEAR) was required to classify different diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: