This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A study was made of the effect of the inhibitors ascorbic acid (C), α-tocopherol (E), and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl-chroman-2-carboxylate (Trolox, T) on the autoxidation of linoleic acid in 0.50 M sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles at pH 7.0 in phosphate buffer. Reactions were thermally initiated at 30 °C in the SDS micelles by a micelle-soluble initiator, di-tert-butylhyponitrite (DBHN). Although water-soluble C alone is an inefficient inhibitor, when combined with micelle-soluble E, it acts synergistically with the latter to extend the efficient antioxidant action of E beyond the sum of the induction periods of C and E acting separately. Similarly C acts synergistically with the water-soluble antioxidant, T. Quantitative studies of these effects under controlled rates of initiation (Ri,) reveal that C functions to regenerate a mole of E (or T) per mole of C used. Kinetic studies show that the rate of autoxidation is first order in micellar linoleic acid and one-half order in micellar DBHN concentrations. Therefore, the classical rate law, −dO2/dt = kp[R—H] (Ri)1/2/(2k1)1/2 is followed. The higher oxidizability (kp/2kt1/2 = 4.48 × 10−2 M−1/2 s−1/2) of linoleate in micelles compared to that in homogeneous solution in chlorobenzene (kp/2kt1/2 = 2.30 × 10−2 M−1/2 s−1/2) is interpreted in terms of the effect of the polar interfacial region of the micelles on a dipolar transition state, R—OŌ: H•R, of the propagation reaction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barclay et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: