Key result
Machine learning applications in device therapy for heart failure offer the potential to improve predictive models and patient outcomes, despite current limitations to widespread implementation.
Why the study?
Heart failure often progresses despite conventional therapies, prompting increasing interest in applying machine learning to big data to improve outcomes in HF device therapy.
This review summarizes the contemporary applications, limitations, and future promises of machine learning in device therapy for heart failure.
ML may aid prediction of advanced HF therapies; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Despite a better understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of heart failure (HF), pharmacotherapy, surgical, and percutaneous interventions do not prevent disease progression in all patients, and a significant proportion of patients end up requiring advanced therapies. Machine learning (ML) is gaining wider acceptance in cardiovascular medicine because of its ability to incorporate large, complex, and multidimensional data and to potentially facilitate the creation of predictive models not constrained by many of the limitations of traditional statistical approaches. With the coexistence of "big data" and novel advanced analytic techniques using ML, there is ever-increasing research into applying ML in the context of HF with the goal of improving patient outcomes. Through this review, the authors describe the basics of ML and summarize the existing published reports regarding contemporary applications of ML in device therapy for HF while highlighting the limitations to widespread implementation and its future promises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gautam et al. (2022) conducted a review in Heart failure. Machine learning was evaluated. Machine learning applications in device therapy for heart failure offer the potential to improve predictive models and patient outcomes, despite current limitations to widespread implementation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: