Key result
Secondary prevention programmes with and without exercise reduce all-cause mortality and recurrent MI in patients with coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Does secondary cardiac prevention programmes with and without exercise components reduce all cause mortality and recurrent MI in patients with coronary artery disease?
Population
Patients with coronary artery disease, including those after acute MI or a coronary revascularisation…
Comparison
Secondary cardiac prevention programmes with and… vs Usual care
Design
Meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
Supports routine use of secondary prevention programs in CAD; confirms benefits independent of exercise component.
Meta-Analysis
Does secondary cardiac prevention programmes with and without exercise components reduce all cause mortality and recurrent MI in patients with coronary artery disease?
Secondary prevention programs, both with and without exercise components, are effective in reducing all-cause mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery disease.
Tim Lancaster (2006) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary artery disease. Secondary prevention programmes with and without exercise vs. Usual care was evaluated on All cause mortality and recurrent MI. Secondary prevention programmes with and without exercise reduce all-cause mortality and recurrent MI in patients with coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: