Key result
Lower spinal bupivacaine doses independently predicted the need for conversion to general anaesthesia (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.38-0.75; p<0.001), which occurred in 1.7% of women overall.
Why the study?
Conversion from spinal to general anaesthesia is associated with complications, and spinal injection of low-dose local anaesthetic has been postulated as a risk factor.
What is the rate of conversion to general anaesthesia and its risk factors in women undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia?
Observational
What is the rate of conversion to general anaesthesia and its risk factors in women undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia?
Odds Ratio: 0.54 (95% CI 0.38–0.75)
p-value: p=< 0.001
A small proportion (1.7%) of women undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia require conversion to general anaesthesia, with lower bupivacaine doses and emergency surgery being significant risk factors.
1.7% conversion rate with ≥10 mg bupivacaine supports adequate spinal dosing for caesarean; leaves open prospective validation of emergency and dose-related risks.
BACKGROUND: Conversion from spinal anaesthesia to general anaesthesia (GA) was shown to be associated with more complications. It has been postulated that spinal injection of a low dose of local anaesthetic is a risk factor. We aimed to discover the rate of conversion from spinal anaesthesia to GA in women who received at least 10 mg heavy bupivacaine and opioids and assess its risk factors. METHODS: All women that underwent spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2020 were included in this analysis. Spinal anaesthesia was performed according to department protocol using heavy bupivacaine 0.5% 10-13 mg, fentanyl 20 μg, and morphine 0.1 mg. We examined rate of conversion from spinal anaesthesia to GA and rate of need for analgesia/sedation. RESULTS: There were 1.7% of women that required conversion to GA. Bupivacaine dose (OR 0.54 [95% CI 0.38 to 0.75], p < 0.001), surgery time (OR 1.03 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.04], p < 0.001), emergency caesarean section (OR 1.06 [95% CI 1.16 to 3.76], p = 0.015), and postpartum haemorrhage (OR 5.96 [95% CI 1.09 to 25.18], p = 0.025) were independent predictors of need for conversion to GA. Of the women who had CS under spinal anaesthesia, 4.1% of parturients required intraoperative analgesics/sedatives and 9.1% required anxiolysis. CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of women required conversion to GA. This conversion occurred especially with emergency caesarean section and when low spinal bupivacaine doses were used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stav et al. (2022) conducted an observational in caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Bupivacaine dose was evaluated on conversion to general anaesthesia (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.75, p=< 0.001). Lower spinal bupivacaine doses independently predicted the need for conversion to general anaesthesia (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.38-0.75; p<0.001), which occurred in 1.7% of women overall.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: