Key result
Dynamic arterial elastance predicted a mean arterial pressure increase of ≥15% after fluid challenge with an area under the curve of 0.810 and an optimal cut-off value of 0.74.
Why the study?
Does dynamic arterial elastance predict a mean arterial pressure increase ≥ 15% after fluid challenge in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy?
Observational (n=39)
No
Does dynamic arterial elastance predict a mean arterial pressure increase ≥ 15% after fluid challenge in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.810 (95% CI 0.650-0.916)
p-value: p=<0.001
Dynamic arterial elastance can effectively predict arterial pressure responsiveness to fluid challenge in hypotensive patients during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
May guide fluid decisions in robot-assisted prostatectomy; extends elastance data to this population but remains hypothesis-generating.
During robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, specific physiological conditions such as carbon dioxide insufflation and the steep Trendelenburg position can alter the cardiac workload and cerebral hemodynamics. Inadequate arterial blood pressure is associated with hypoperfusion, organ damage, and poor outcomes. Dynamic arterial elastance (Ea) has been proposed to be a useful index of fluid management in hypotensive patients. We therefore evaluated whether dynamic Ea can predict a mean arterial pressure (MAP) increase ≥ 15% after fluid challenge during pneumoperitoneum and the steep Trendelenburg position.We enrolled 39 patients receiving robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Fluid challenge was performed with 500 mL colloids in the presence of preload-dependent conditions and arterial hypotension. Patients were classified as arterial pressure responders or arterial pressure nonresponders according to whether they showed an MAP increase ≥15% after fluid challenge. Dynamic Ea was defined as the ratio between the pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the arterial pressure responsiveness after fluid challenge during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.Of the 39 patients, 17 were arterial pressure responders and 22 were arterial pressure nonresponders. The mean dynamic Ea before fluid challenge was significantly higher in arterial pressure responders than in arterial pressure nonresponders (0.79 vs 0.61, P < 0.001). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, dynamic Ea showed an area under the curve of 0.810. The optimal cut-off value of dynamic Ea for predicting an MAP increase of ≥ 15% after fluid challenge was 0.74.Dynamic Ea can predict an MAP increase ≥ 15% after fluid challenge during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. This result suggests that evaluation of arterial pressure responsiveness using dynamic Ea helps to maintain an adequate arterial blood pressure and to improve perioperative outcomes in preload-dependent patients receiving robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy under pneumoperitoneum and in the steep Trendelenburg position.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Prostate cancer undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (n=39). Dynamic arterial elastance was evaluated on Prediction of mean arterial pressure increase ≥15% after fluid challenge (AUC 0.810, 95% CI 0.650-0.916, p=<0.001). Dynamic arterial elastance predicted a mean arterial pressure increase of ≥15% after fluid challenge with an area under the curve of 0.810 and an optimal cut-off value of 0.74.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: