Key result
SVV outperforms Eadyn to emerge as the most accurate predictor of fluid responsiveness.
Why the study?
Optimizing fluid therapy is critical in elderly patients undergoing major surgeries, and dynamic arterial elastance has been proposed to predict fluid responsiveness in prone-positioned spine surgery under general anesthesia.
Does dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) predict fluid responsiveness in elderly patients undergoing spine surgery in the prone position?
Observational (n=37)
Does dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) predict fluid responsiveness in elderly patients undergoing spine surgery in the prone position?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.508
In elderly patients undergoing prone spine surgery, stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation are superior to dynamic arterial elastance for predicting fluid responsiveness.
SVV may be prioritized over Eadyn for fluid responsiveness in prone elderly spine surgery; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Optimizing fluid therapy is critical for maintaining hemodynamic stability in elderly patients undergoing major surgeries. Dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn), defined as the ratio of pulse pressure variation (PPV) to stroke volume variation (SVV), has been proposed as a predictor of fluid responsiveness, especially in challenging conditions like prone-positioned spine surgery under general anesthesia. Methods: Hemodynamic parameters were measured before and after fluid loading with 500 mL of crystalloid solution. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders based on a ≥15% increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) post-fluid administration. Predictive performance of these parameters was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Of the 37 patients, 15 were classified as responders and 22 as non-responders. Eadyn demonstrated poor predictive performance (AUC = 0.508). In contrast, SVV (AUC = 0.808), PPV (AUC = 0.738), and C (AUC = 0.741) exhibited moderate to high predictive ability. Responders exhibited significantly higher baseline SVV, PPV, and net arterial compliance compared to non-responders. Conclusions: Dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) showed limited predictive ability for fluid responsiveness in elderly patients undergoing spine surgery in the prone position. In contrast, stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), and net arterial compliance (C) demonstrated superior reliability, with SVV emerging as the most accurate predictor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Elderly patients undergoing spine surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia (n=37). Dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) vs. Stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), and net arterial compliance (C) was evaluated on Fluid responsiveness (≥15% increase in mean arterial pressure post-fluid administration) (AUC 0.508). Dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) showed limited predictive ability for fluid responsiveness (AUC 0.508), whereas stroke volume variation (SVV) emerged as the most accurate predictor (AUC 0.808).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: