Key result
Irrigated gold tip catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation resulted in significantly lower mean catheter tip temperature (35.4 vs 38.2 °C, P<0.001) and higher delivered energy than platinum.
Why the study?
Does an irrigated gold tip catheter improve procedural parameters (tip temperature, delivered power, cooling flow) compared to a platinum iridium tip catheter in patients undergoing PVI and CTI ablation?
RCT (n=60)
Does an irrigated gold tip catheter improve procedural parameters (tip temperature, delivered power, cooling flow) compared to a platinum iridium tip catheter in patients undergoing PVI and CTI ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 35.4% vs 38.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Irrigated gold tip catheters allow for higher energy delivery at lower tip temperatures and require less cooling flow compared to conventional platinum iridium catheters during PVI and CTI ablation.
Supports gold-tip preference for optimized PVI parameters; extends randomized evidence on irrigated catheter materials.
INTRODUCTION: In order to optimize power delivery into the myocardium during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) without overheating the electrode tip, active cooling of the tip electrode as well as electrode tips made of gold have evolved. Recently, an externally irrigated gold tip electrode ablation catheter has been developed to combine the advantages of these 2 technologies. We sought to investigate the procedural parameters tip temperature, delivered power and cooling flow requirements of the irrigated gold tip catheter in comparison to the conventional irrigated platinum iridium (Pt) tip catheter in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients referred for first PVI were randomized into ablation with irrigated gold tip catheter versus irrigated Pt tip catheter. Forty-nine patients received ablation of CTI following PVI. Mean and standard deviation from all measurements were calculated for each patient. During RFA of pulmonary veins, mean catheter tip temperature was significantly lower in the gold group (35.4 ± 0.9 °C vs 38.2 ± 0.8 °C, P < 0.001), and total amount of delivered energy was higher (1303.1 ± 81.1 W vs 1223.7 ± 115.6 W, P = 0.004). During CTI ablation, necessary saline flow was almost 2.5-fold lower in the gold group (22.5 ± 5.9 mL/min vs 52.5 ± 9.7 mL/min, P < 0.001), accompanied by significantly lower tip temperature (39.1 ± 0.6 °C vs 40.5 ± 1.4 °C, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The irrigated gold tip electrode allows to deliver significantly more energy at a lower electrode tip temperature in RFA of PV and CTI in comparison to the irrigated Pt tip electrode. The required saline flow during CTI ablation is much lower than in Pt.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Linhart et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in First pulmonary vein isolation (n=60). Irrigated gold tip catheter vs. Irrigated platinum iridium (Pt) tip catheter was evaluated on Mean catheter tip temperature during RFA of pulmonary veins (°C) (p=<0.001). Irrigated gold tip catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation resulted in significantly lower mean catheter tip temperature (35.4 vs 38.2 °C, P<0.001) and higher delivered energy than platinum.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: