Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
During the ascendency of ethology, the study of animal behaviour contributed to taxonomic and phyletic issues, but the approach faded in parallel with the waning of systematic studies in general. Systematics and particularly phylogeny has experienced a resurgence with the advent of molecular tools. The understanding of behavioural evolution has benefited from molecular phylogenies. Behaviour's reciprocal contribution, however, currently lies chiefly in resolving the validity of species designation of allopatric species and in potentially helping in the overall classification of species. I review and evaluate the experimental methods favoured in seeking behavioural isolating mechanisms, and the challenge to the species concept when gene trees and species trees disagree. The dynamic situation in the Great Lakes of Africa offers under‐exploited opportunities to test whether behavioural isolating mechanisms evolve in the absence of secondary contact. Given that behaviour is more immediately responsive to changes in the physical and biological environment, behaviour may be the single most salient adaptive feature in speciation events. The species concept is viewed as a fuzzy but nonetheless useful set.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
George W. Barlow (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: