Key result
Performing culprit-vessel revascularization before contralateral or complete diagnostic angiography significantly reduced median vascular access-to-balloon time by 4 to 6 minutes.
Why the study?
Does culprit-vessel revascularization prior to diagnostic angiography reduce vascular access-to-balloon time in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=925)
No
Does culprit-vessel revascularization prior to diagnostic angiography reduce vascular access-to-balloon time in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Performing culprit-vessel PCI before complete diagnostic angiography significantly reduces vascular access-to-balloon time by 4-6 minutes, though this small reduction did not impact 30-day clinical outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Small time savings without outcome benefit should not alter primary PCI strategy; warrants randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Delays are important markers of quality of care in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. There is scarce data on the impact of obtaining a complete diagnostic angiography before primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention at our institution between January 2012 and December 2014 were studied. After excluding patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery, 925 patients were included in the analysis. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to the as-treated revascularization strategy: culprit-vessel revascularization first, contralateral angiography first, or complete angiography first. Propensity score matching was used to minimize difference in clinical characteristics between groups. Predictors of culprit-vessel first revascularization were anterior/lateral infarct location and absence of diabetes mellitus. After propensity score matching, the median vascular access-to-balloon time was 4 to 6 minutes shorter with a culprit-vessel revascularization first strategy. This reduction in time to reperfusion increased the proportion of patients treated within recommended delays. However, there was no significant difference in 30-day clinical outcomes associated with these delays reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Performing culprit-vessel primary percutaneous coronary intervention before contralateral or complete diagnostic angiography is associated with a statistically significant reduction in vascular access-to-balloon time, although the 4- to 6-minute difference is unlikely to be clinically relevant. This small but significant reduction could translate in an augmentation in the proportion of patients treated within recommended delays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Couture et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n=925). Culprit-vessel revascularization first vs. Contralateral or complete angiography first was evaluated on Vascular access-to-balloon time (4 to 6 minutes shorter). Performing culprit-vessel revascularization before contralateral or complete diagnostic angiography significantly reduced median vascular access-to-balloon time by 4 to 6 minutes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: