Key result
A deep learning model using random forest-selected variables significantly outperformed the conventional TIMI risk score in predicting in-hospital mortality among elderly Asian patients with STEMI (AUC 0.954 vs 0.750).
Why the study?
Limited research has investigated deep learning and machine learning for predicting in-hospital mortality after STEMI specifically in Asian elderly patients aged 65 years and above.
Does a Deep Learning algorithm improve in-hospital mortality prediction compared to the TIMI score in elderly Asian STEMI patients?
Observational (n=3,991)
Yes
Does a Deep Learning algorithm improve in-hospital mortality prediction compared to the TIMI score in elderly Asian STEMI patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.954 (95% CI 0.942-0.966)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.954% vs 0.75%
p-value: p=<0.00001
Deep learning models utilizing machine learning feature selection significantly outperform the conventional TIMI risk score for predicting in-hospital mortality in elderly Asian patients with STEMI.
DL/ML models may aid in-hospital mortality prediction in Asian elderly STEMI patients; leaves open superiority over conventional scores without prospective validation.
Limited research has been conducted in Asian elderly patients (aged 65 years and above) for in-hospital mortality prediction after an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using Deep Learning (DL) and Machine Learning (ML). We used DL and ML to predict in-hospital mortality in Asian elderly STEMI patients and compared it to a conventional risk score for myocardial infraction outcomes. Malaysia's National Cardiovascular Disease Registry comprises an ethnically diverse Asian elderly population (3991 patients). 50 variables helped in establishing the in-hospital death prediction model. The TIMI score was used to predict mortality using DL and feature selection methods from ML algorithms. The main performance metric was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The DL and ML model constructed using ML feature selection outperforms the conventional risk scoring score, TIMI (AUC 0.75). DL built from ML features (AUC ranging from 0.93 to 0.95) outscored DL built from all features (AUC 0.93). The TIMI score underestimates mortality in the elderly. TIMI predicts 18.4% higher mortality than the DL algorithm (44.7%). All ML feature selection algorithms identify age, fasting blood glucose, heart rate, Killip class, oral hypoglycemic agent, systolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol as common predictors of mortality in the elderly. In a multi-ethnic population, DL outperformed the TIMI risk score in classifying elderly STEMI patients. ML improves death prediction by identifying separate characteristics in older Asian populations. Continuous testing and validation will improve future risk classification, management, and results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kasim et al. (2022) conducted an observational in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=3,991). Deep Learning prediction model vs. TIMI risk score was evaluated on In-hospital mortality prediction (Area under the ROC curve) (AUC 0.954, 95% CI 0.942-0.966, p=<0.00001). A deep learning model using random forest-selected variables significantly outperformed the conventional TIMI risk score in predicting in-hospital mortality among elderly Asian patients with STEMI (AUC 0.954 vs 0.750).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: