Key result
Local infiltration of anesthetics during operative treatment of murine femur fractures did not significantly affect callus formation or mineralization compared to saline control.
Why the study?
Local anesthetic infiltration may reduce postoperative pain and narcotic usage, but prior data suggest these agents are chondrotoxic, raising concern that they could impede secondary fracture healing.
Does local infiltrative analgesia with local anesthetics decrease secondary bone healing in a murine femur fracture model?
Does local infiltrative analgesia with local anesthetics decrease secondary bone healing in a murine femur fracture model?
p-value: p=>0.05
Local infiltrative analgesia with local anesthetics does not significantly inhibit secondary bone healing in a murine femur fracture model, supporting its safety as an adjunct for perioperative pain control.
Supports local infiltration for fracture analgesia without healing concerns in models; leaves open confirmation in human trials.
The opioid epidemic in the United States has forced care providers to seek out alternatives to narcotic analgesics. Physicians involved in trauma care, including orthopaedic trauma surgeons, often have patients requiring significant amounts of these medications, especially in the perioperative period, given the acuity and severity of their injuries. Modalities such as local infiltration of fractures with anesthetic agents during operative treatment may provide some benefit to this population by decreasing postoperative pain and narcotic usage. However, prior data suggest that these agents are chondrotoxic, which may impede secondary fracture healing. The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that local anesthetics decrease secondary bone healing and callus formation in stabilized murine femur fractures through chondrocyte apoptosis. Male C57BL/6 mice underwent intramedullary stabilization and fracture of bilateral femurs followed by immediate infiltration of the fracture site with local anesthetic agents. Femurs were dissected at 10- and 20-days post-fracture and evaluated by [Formula: see text]CT and histological analysis. No significant differences were seen in callus size or mineralization between controls and fractures treated with a local anesthetic. When the callus was analyzed histologically, local anesthetic agents appeared to increase cartilage density. Therefore, infiltration of local anesthetics during operative treatment of fracture as part of a multimodal approach to pain control does not appear to significantly affect callus formation in a preclinical model, although subclinical molecular effects may be present. Local infiltrative analgesia with local anesthetics may be used as an adjunct for perioperative pain control during femur fracture surgery without a significant effect on secondary bone healing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tyler et al. (2022) studied Femur fracture (n=20). Local anesthetic (lidocaine, ropivacaine, bupivacaine, liposomal bupivacaine) vs. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was evaluated on Callus size (total volume, bone volume, bone volume fraction) and mineralization (bone mineral density, tissue mineral density) via microCT (p=>0.05). Local infiltration of anesthetics during operative treatment of murine femur fractures did not significantly affect callus formation or mineralization compared to saline control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: