Key result
Prasugrel or ticagrelor combined with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.81) compared to clopidogrel in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.
Why the study?
The efficacy and safety of prasugrel- or ticagrelor-based triple-antiplatelet treatments combined with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor relative to clopidogrel-based regimens had not been established in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.
Does prasugrel or ticagrelor reduce MACEs compared to clopidogrel in STEMI patients undergoing PCI and treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors?
Meta-Analysis (n=11,874)
Does prasugrel or ticagrelor reduce MACEs compared to clopidogrel in STEMI patients undergoing PCI and treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors?
In STEMI patients undergoing PCI and receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, triple-antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel or ticagrelor reduces MACE compared to clopidogrel without increasing bleeding risk.
May support prasugrel/ticagrelor TAPT to lower MACE without excess bleeding in STEMI PCI; leaves open need for large RCT confirmation.
BACKGROUND: antagonists, including prasugrel or ticagrelor, has not been established relative to that of the clopidogrel-based triple-antiplatelet treatments (TAPTs; in combination with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor). The present meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of prasugrel- or ticagrelor-based TAPTs relative to that of clopidogrel TAPTs in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI. METHODS: The databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane's Library were systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials concerning prasugrel or ticagrelor (test) relative to clopidogrel (control). Depending on heterogeneity, studies were pooled with a random effects or a fixed effects model. Outcomes of blood flow after PCI were evaluated, including TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction), bleeding events, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 11,874 patients conformed to the inclusion criteria. The pooled results with the fixed effects model indicated that after PCI patients in the prasugrel or ticagrelor groups were as likely as those treated with clopidogrel to achieve TIMI grade 3 flow or experience bleeding events. However, compared with the control, the test groups had significantly less risk of MACE (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.94, P = 0.004), especially at the 1-year follow-up (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66-0.95, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A prasugrel- or ticagrelor-based TAPT may reduce the rate of MACEs, without increasing bleeding in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. However, due to the limited RCT studies and variations in study weight, results of this meta-analysis should be confirmed in a large RCT with adequate sample size and follow-up duration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PCI (n=11,874). Prasugrel or ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94, p=0.004). Prasugrel or ticagrelor combined with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.81) compared to clopidogrel in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: