Key result
Aortic valve replacement with biological substitutes in children demonstrated 1.4% early mortality and a 9.6% reoperation rate over a median follow-up of 94 months.
Why the study?
Does aortic valve replacement with biological substitutes provide acceptable midterm outcomes in children with aortic valve disease?
Cohort (n=73)
Does aortic valve replacement with biological substitutes provide acceptable midterm outcomes in children with aortic valve disease?
Aortic valve replacement with biological substitutes in children demonstrates acceptable midterm hemodynamics and survival with a low rate of early mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support biological AVR in select children; leaves open randomized comparisons with mechanical prostheses.
BACKGROUND: this study was performed to assess the results of aortic valve replacement in children with biological substitutes including homografts, pulmonary autografts (Ross procedure), and aortic valve reconstruction with autologous pericardium (Duran technique). METHODS: between March 1992 and July 2009, 73 children with aortic valve disease (mean age, 11.8 ±2.7 years) underwent aortic valve replacement with biological substitutes including homografts, pulmonary autografts, and aortic valve reconstruction with autologous pericardium. Associated procedures were mitral valve repair in 32 and subaortic membrane resection in 3. RESULTS: early mortality was 1.4% (1 patient). Median follow-up was 94 months. Sixty (83.3%) survivors had insignificant aortic regurgitation. Reoperation was required in 7 (9.6%) patients: for autograft dysfunction alone in 2, autograft failure and failed mitral valve repair in 2, autograft dysfunction with severe pulmonary homograft regurgitation in 1, severe homograft aortic valve regurgitation in 1, and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction in 1. There were 4 (5.4%) late deaths. Actuarial reoperation-free, event-free, and aortic valve dysfunction-free survival were 92.5% ±4%, 93.4% ±3.3 %, 94% ±2.9%, 86.2% ±4.3%, respectively, at 94 months. CONCLUSIONS: aortic valve replacement with biological substitutes is associated with acceptable hemodynamics and midterm results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talwar et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve disease (n=73). Aortic valve replacement with biological substitutes was evaluated on Early mortality. Aortic valve replacement with biological substitutes in children demonstrated 1.4% early mortality and a 9.6% reoperation rate over a median follow-up of 94 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: