Key result
The NucliSens EV assay demonstrated significantly superior sensitivity for detecting enterovirus in cerebrospinal fluid compared to viral culture (97.9% vs 65.6%, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the NucliSens EV assay improve the detection of enterovirus RNA in CSF compared to viral culture in adult and pediatric patients?
Observational (n=992)
Yes
Does the NucliSens EV assay improve the detection of enterovirus RNA in CSF compared to viral culture in adult and pediatric patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 97.9% vs 65.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
The NucliSens EV assay provides a highly sensitive and specific method for detecting enterovirus RNA in CSF, outperforming traditional viral culture.
May improve CSF enterovirus detection over culture; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact.
The combination of nucleic acid sequence-based amplification and electrochemiluminescence detection was used to develop an internally controlled, highly sensitive and specific assay for the detection of enterovirus (EV) RNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The analytical performance of the assay was determined using both in vitro-transcribed EV RNAs and viral culture isolates. The sensitivity of the assay was 10 EV RNA copies per amplification reaction. The assay detected all enteroviral isolates tested with no cross-reactivity to 21 nonenteroviral species, including rhinovirus and parechovirus. The clinical performance of the assay was evaluated by testing 992 CSF specimens collected from adult and pediatric patients. NucliSens EV results from a subset of 327 CSF samples were compared to viral culture of nasopharyngeal specimens and rectal swabs (n = 195) and/or CSF (n = 212). Of the 212 CSF samples, 96 samples were positive by either the NucliSens EV assay (94/96; 97.9%) or culture (63/96; 65.6%), and 61/96 (63.5%) were positive by both methods. The inclusion of an EV-specific internal control monitored the entire process, including the efficiency of nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and detection. In total, only five blood-clotted CSF samples (0.5%) were inhibited. The NucliSens EV assay demonstrated superior sensitivity over viral culture (P < 0.001), excellent specificity, clear delineation of positive samples, and minimal amplification inhibition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ginocchio et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Enterovirus infection / Aseptic meningitis (n=992). NucliSens EV assay vs. Viral culture was evaluated on Detection of enterovirus in positive cerebrospinal fluid samples (p=<0.001). The NucliSens EV assay demonstrated significantly superior sensitivity for detecting enterovirus in cerebrospinal fluid compared to viral culture (97.9% vs 65.6%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: