Why the study?
Does a single dose of JE-VLP with adjuvants (γ-PGA-NPs or alum) improve protection against lethal JEV infection in mice compared to JE-VLP alone?
Does a single dose of JE-VLP with adjuvants (γ-PGA-NPs or alum) improve protection against lethal JEV infection in mice compared to JE-VLP alone?
A single dose of JE-VLP with γ-PGA-NPs or alum adjuvants provides >90% protection against lethal JEV infection in mice for over 6 months, offering a potential single-injection vaccine strategy.
Requires human validation before clinical use; leaves open translation of adjuvant-enhanced JE-VLP from mice.
To maintain immunity against Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), a formalin-inactivated Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccine should be administered several times. The repeated vaccination is not helpful in the case of a sudden outbreak of JEV or when urgent travel to a high-JEV-risk region is required; however, there are few single-injection JE vaccine options. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of a single dose of a new effective JE virus-like particle preparation containing the JE envelope protein (JE-VLP). Although single administration with JE-VLP protected less than 50% of mice against lethal JEV infection, adding poly(γ-glutamic acid) nanoparticles (γ-PGA-NPs) or aluminum adjuvant (alum) to JE-VLP significantly protected more than 90% of the mice. A single injection of JE-VLP with either γ-PGA-NPs or alum induced a significantly greater anti-JEV neutralizing antibody titer than JE-VLP alone. The enhanced titers were maintained for more than 6 months, resulting in long-lasting protection of 90% of the immunized mice. Although the vaccine design needs further modification to reach 100% protection, a single dose of JE-VLP with γ-PGA-NPs may be a useful step in developing a next-generation vaccine to stop a JE outbreak or to immunize travelers or military personnel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okamoto et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: