Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Requires vigilant CV monitoring for noncardiac drugs; leaves open unified assessment frameworks across oncology, hypertension, and diabetes.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular safety has become a central component of contemporary drug development and therapeutic use since noncardiovascular drugs can exert cardiovascular harms. Appropriate preapproval investigations and monitoring during clinical practice are therefore advantageous. Areas covered: Integrated cardiovascular safety is a broad field of investigation. This review focuses on three areas of assessment specifically chosen to exemplify advances and challenges in this field: the cardiotoxicity of oncologic agents, off-target blood pressure (BP) increases to noncardiovascular drugs, and the cardiovascular safety of new antidiabetic drugs for type 2 diabetes (T2D). Expert opinion: Good progress has been made in the field of Cardio-oncology in the last decade, and endeavors to include discipline-specific training in medical curricula are particularly encouraging. Less formalized progress has been made with regard to addressing off-target BP increases. In the third domain discussed, recent developments suggest that the focus of attention may shift from cardiovascular safety to cardiovascular benefit in light of a recent decision by the US FDA: in December 2016 it approved a new indication for empagliflozin to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death in adult patients with T2D and established cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Rick Turner (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: