Why the study?
Does a concurrent chronic total occlusion in a non-infarct artery worsen long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease?
Does a concurrent chronic total occlusion in a non-infarct artery worsen long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease?
A concurrent chronic total occlusion in a non-infarct artery is associated with poor long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease.
Recently, growing evidence demonstrates that recanalization of chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions exerts a beneficial effect in terms of improvement in left ventricular function and long-term survival by alleviating residual/recurrent angina, and reduces the need for coronary artery bypass grafting. 1)2)However, it remains unclear whether successful recanalization of a CTO in the non-infarctrelated artery (non-IRA) could improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).][5] A concurrent CTO in a non-IRA is present in 12% to 13% of patients with STEMI. 3)5)In terms of primary PCI for STEMI, previous studies demonstrated that the effect of MVD on mortality is mainly determined by the presence of a CTO in a non-IRA. 4)6)The presence of CTO lesions is a risk factor for incomplete PCI revascularization, which may, in turn, increase mortality compared to complete revascularization.Tajstra et al. 7) described in a cohort of 1658 STEMI patients that the effect of MVD on mortality was primarily due to the presence of a CTO in a non-IRA, which was found to be a strong and independent predic-
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hee-Yeol Kim (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: