Why the study?
Does the presence of multivessel coronary disease with chronic total occlusion increase one-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does the presence of multivessel coronary disease with chronic total occlusion increase one-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with acute myocardial infarction, multivessel disease is an independent predictor of one-year mortality, whereas the presence of a successfully revascularized CTO is not.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of multivessel coronary disease (MVD) with chronic total occlusion (CTO) on one-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is not clearly known. We investigated the impact of MVD with concurrent CTO lesion on one-year mortality in patients with AMI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 1008 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography between November 2005 and December 2008 with a diagnosis of AMI. RESULTS: Among 1008 patients, 432 patients (43%) had MVD, and 88 patients (8.7%) had CTO lesion. The one-year overall mortality was higher in patients with MVD than in patients with single vessel disease (SVD) (10.2% vs. 5.9%, p=0.012). However, the one-year overall mortality was not significantly higher in patients with CTO lesion than in patients without that lesion (12.5% vs. 7.3%, p=0.080). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of one-year overall mortality were age older than 65 years {hazard ratio (HR) 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.43 to 4.08}, Killip class ≥III (HR 3.59, 95% CI: 2.24 to 5.77), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (HR 2.45, 95% CI: 1.49 to 4.05) and MVD (HR 1.76, 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.89). CONCLUSION: Patients with MVD showed higher one-year mortality than patients with SVD. However, the presence of CTO was not an independent predictor of one-year mortality in this study that included patients with successfully revascularized CTO lesion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: