Why the study?
There are no known antiviral therapies for EV-D68-associated acute flaccid myelitis, and it was unknown whether antiviral treatments are effective if initiated after the onset of neurologic symptoms.
Does 15C5-Chmra reduce paralysis severity in a mouse model of EV-D68-associated acute flaccid myelitis?
Does 15C5-Chmra reduce paralysis severity in a mouse model of EV-D68-associated acute flaccid myelitis?
In a mouse model of EV-D68-associated acute flaccid myelitis, treatment with a neutralizing monoclonal antibody after the onset of paralysis significantly reduced paralysis severity and improved survival.
May support testing delayed antivirals in EV-D68 AFM models; leaves open efficacy when started after neurologic onset in children.
Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) can cause mild to severe respiratory illness and is associated with a poliomyelitis-like paralytic syndrome called acute flaccid myelitis (AFM). Most cases of EV-D68-associated AFM occur in young children who are brought to the clinic after the onset of neurologic symptoms. There are currently no known antiviral therapies for AFM, and it is unknown whether antiviral treatments will be effective if initiated after the onset of neurologic symptoms (when patients are likely to present for medical care). We developed a "clinical treatment model" for AFM, in which individual EV-D68-infected mice are tracked and treated with an EV-D68-specific human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody after the onset of moderate paralysis. Mice treated with antibody had significantly better paralysis outcomes compared to nonspecific antibody-treated controls. Treatment did not reverse paralysis that was present at the time of treatment initiation but did slow the further loss of function, including progression of weakness to other limbs, as well as reducing viral titer in the muscle and spinal cords of treated animals. We observed the greatest therapeutic effect in EV-D68 isolates which were neutralized by low concentrations of antibody, and diminishing therapeutic effect in EV-D68 isolates which required higher doses of antibody for neutralization. This work supports the use of virus-specific immunotherapy for the treatment of AFM. It also suggests that patients who present with AFM should be treated as soon as possible if recent infection with EV-D68 is suspected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rudy et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: