Why the study?
Doxorubicin is effective for breast cancer but causes cardiotoxicity in over 25% of patients, prompting evaluation of red cell distribution width to monitor associated adverse events.
Does red cell distribution width (RDW) correlate with doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in women with breast cancer?
Does red cell distribution width (RDW) correlate with doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in women with breast cancer?
RDW increases after doxorubicin treatment in breast cancer patients but does not appear to be a useful biomarker for predicting cardiotoxicity.
RDW tracks doxorubicin exposure but not cardiotoxicity in breast cancer; leaves open its value as a response biomarker.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the most frequent cause of death in women. Doxorubicin, an anthracycline, is an important drug due to its efficacy in treating solid cancers, especially breast cancer. However, this drug is often responsible for cardiotoxicity that may affect more than 25% of patients. This study aimed to evaluate the red cell distribution width (RDW) in women with breast cancer to monitor adverse events associated with the use of doxorubicin. A prospective study of 80 women with breast malignancy undergoing neoadjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy was conducted. The patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), just after the last cycle of chemotherapy with doxorubicin (T1), and 1 year after the treatment (T2). There was a significant increase over the time points for the RDW (p < 0.001). There was a negative correlation between the RDW and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at T1. The RDW did not show a significant difference between the groups classified according to cardiotoxicity. Based on these results, the RDW is a cost-effective test that shows a relationship with the doxorubicin response, but not with cardiotoxicity. It is a potential biomarker to evaluate patients with breast cancer after they receive chemotherapy with doxorubicin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simões et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: