Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Red cell distribution width (RDW), a routine blood indicator, assesses mortality risk in coronary artery disease (CAD). Considering varied consensus, we explored RDW's predictive value in long-term mortality risk in patients with CAD post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS databases were systematically reviewed for studies (Jan 2019 to Jan 2024) examining RDW's association with long-term follow-up, all-cause, and cardiovascular mortality in CAD patients undergoing PCI. Primary outcomes include cardiovascular and all-cause mortality (ACM). Pooled outcomes used binary random effects models with I2 statistics for inter-study heterogeneity. Leave-one-out meta-analysis assessed individual study impact on overall estimate, and statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Our meta-analysis of five studies (3 China, 1 Brazil, 1 Taiwan) included 17,583 CAD patients post-PCI, mostly males (76.6%, n=13,469). Median follow-up was 2.78 years. Pooled analysis revealed that RDW independently predicted all-cause mortality (OR 1.65, 95CI 1.20-2.28, p<0.01, I2=79.86%), with no significance in cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.39, 95CI 1.18-1.63, p=0.2, I2=37.89%). Adjusted for modifiable risk factors, multivariate odds revealed a strong association with ACM (OR 2.1, 95CI 1.54-2.87, p<0.01, I2=77.41%). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness of findings. This meta-analysis showed RDW as an independent predictor for long-term all-cause mortality in CAD patients post-PCI, suggesting clinical utility for outcome improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katukuri et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: