Why the study?
Does elevated D-dimer level combined with CHADS₂ score predict subsequent thromboembolic events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation on warfarin?
Does elevated D-dimer level combined with CHADS₂ score predict subsequent thromboembolic events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation on warfarin?
Adding D-dimer levels to the CHADS₂ score significantly improves the prediction of thromboembolic events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation on warfarin.
D-dimer addition to CHADS₂ may improve thromboembolic prediction in warfarin-treated AF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with hemostatic abnormality and increased risk of thromboembolic events. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether elevated D-dimer levels in combination with clinical risk factors can adequately predict subsequent thromboembolic events in patients with AF. METHOD: This was a post hoc analysis of the single-center, prospective observational study. Consecutive patients with nonvalvular AF (245 patients, 74 ± 9 years) treated with warfarin were included. D-dimer levels were measured in combination with clinical risk factors to assess the relationship of this parameter with subsequent thromboembolic events. RESULTS: D-dimer levels were elevated (≥0.5 μg/ml) in 55 (22%) patients. During an average follow-up time of 756 ± 223 days, 9 (1.8%/year) thromboembolic events occurred. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that elevated D-dimer levels (hazard ratio, HR, 14.3, p < 0.01) as well as high CHADS₂ score (≥3; HR 9.43, p < 0.01) was associated with thromboembolic events. C-statistic improved to 0.848 from 0.781 when D-dimer level was added to the predictor model based on CHADS₂ score. Elevated D-dimer levels also predicted thromboembolic events in the subgroup of patients with high CHADS₂ score (n = 76, HR 12.1, p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: CHADS₂ scores and D-dimer level can be a useful marker of subsequent thromboembolic events in patients with AF during oral anticoagulant therapy and combination of these can effectively predict thromboembolic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadanaga et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: