Why the study?
Does aortic stiffness differ between individuals with and without aortic dilatation in families with inherited non-syndromic thoracic aortic disease?
Does aortic stiffness differ between individuals with and without aortic dilatation in families with inherited non-syndromic thoracic aortic disease?
Aortic stiffness may serve as an early, complementary marker for disease progression in families with inherited non-syndromic thoracic aortic disease, even before overt dilatation occurs.
Aortic stiffness may complement diameter assessment in familial TAAD; leaves open its value for risk stratification or intervention guidance.
BACKGROUND: In families with an inherited form of non-syndromic thoracic aortic disease (TAAD), aortic diameter alone is not a reliable marker for disease occurrence or progression. To identify other parameters of aortic function, we studied aortic stiffness in families with TAAD. We also compared diameter measurements obtained by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Seven families, including 116 individuals, with non-syndromic TAAD, were studied. The aortic diameter was measured by TTE and MRI. Aortic stiffness was assessed as local distensibility in the ascending aorta and as regional and global pulse wave velocity (PWV). Individuals with a dilated thoracic aorta (n = 21) were compared with those without aortic dilatation (n = 95). RESULTS: = 0.93). The individuals with dilated aortas were older than those without dilatation (49 vs 37 years old). Ascending aortic diameter increased and distensibility decreased with increasing age; while, PWV increased with age and diameter. Some young subjects without aortic dilatation showed increased aortic stiffness. Individuals with a dilated thoracic aorta had significantly higher PWV and lower distensibility, measured by MRI than individuals without dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Diameters measured with TTE agree with those measured by MRI. Aortic stiffness might be a complementary marker for aortic disease and progression when used with aortic diameter, especially in young individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannuksela et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: