Why the study?
Does once daily administration of acenocoumarol provide stable anticoagulant effects compared to twice daily administration in patients with deep venous thrombosis?
Does once daily administration of acenocoumarol provide stable anticoagulant effects compared to twice daily administration in patients with deep venous thrombosis?
Once-daily administration of acenocoumarol provides stable pharmacodynamic activity in patients with deep venous thrombosis, suggesting that twice-daily dosing is not justified despite the drug's short half-life.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports once-daily acenocoumarol dosing in DVT; confirms twice-daily offers no INR or factor stability advantage.
The literature suggests that variations in anticoagulant effect occur when acenocoumarol is administrated in a daily dose. We assessed the anticoagulant effects of acenocoumarol with INR, factors VII and X and protein C in 12 randomly selected hospitalised patients with deep-vein thrombosis, six of them receiving a daily dose of acenocoumarol, the other six receiving twice daily doses. When the drug effect had been at a steady-state for at least 72 h, five blood samples were drawn per patient over a period of 24 h. No nycthemeral significant variations were noted for INR, factor X and protein C in the two groups (P > 0.10). Nycthemeral significant variation in factor VII when acenocoumarol was administered once daily was noted (P = 0.02), but the clinical relevance of factor VII variation at steady-state is uncertain. In spite of the short pharmacokinetic half-life of acenocoumarol, a stable nycthemeral pharmacodynamic activity was observed after once daily administration; twice-daily administration of acenocoumarol does not appear to be justified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mismetti et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: