Why the study?
Although common carotid artery intima-media thickness is an established cardiovascular risk marker, reported associations between changes in CCA-IMT and stroke risk have yielded conflicting findings.
Is increased common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) associated with an increased risk of stroke and its subtypes?
Is increased common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) associated with an increased risk of stroke and its subtypes?
Increased carotid intima-media thickness is significantly associated with a higher risk of ischaemic stroke, particularly the large vessel disease subtype.
CCA-IMT may refine stroke subtype risk stratification in observational cohorts; leaves open incremental value over standard predictors in prospective settings.
INTRODUCTION: An increase in the common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) is generally considered an early marker of atherosclerosis and is a well-established predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). An association between changes in CCA-IMT and risk of stroke has been reported but has conflicting findings. OBJECTIVE: The present meta-analysis was aimed to clarify the association between CCA-IMT with the risk of stroke and its subtype by estimating pooled analysis of published literature. METHODS: Comprehensive search for all published articles was performed in electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Trip Databases, Worldwide Science, CINAHL and Google Scholar from 01 January 1950 to 30 April 2020. RESULTS: In our meta-analysis, a total of 19 studies, of which sixteen studies involving 3475 ischaemic stroke (IS) cases and 11 826 controls; six studies with 902 large vessel disease (LVD) and 548 small vessel disease (SVD) of IS subtypes; five studies with 228 intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) and 1032 IS cases, were included. Our findings suggest a strong association between increased CCA-IMT with risk of IS as compared to control subjects [SMD = 1.46, 95% CI = 0.90-2.02]. However, there is an increased risk of LVD as compared to the SVD subtype of IS [SMD = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.19-0.52] and more chance of occurrence of IS rather than ICH [SMD = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.28-1.41]. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid intima thickness measurements are found to be associated with the risk of stroke along with its subtypes and may be used as a diagnostic marker for predicting the risk of stroke events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: