Why the study?
Studies linking carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) to ischemic stroke (IS) risk have shown inconsistent results, and whether this association varies by IS subtype or interacts with genetic risk is unclear.
Is higher carotid intima-media thickness associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke subtypes, and is this modified by the rs2910164 polymorphism in miR-146a?
Is higher carotid intima-media thickness associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke subtypes, and is this modified by the rs2910164 polymorphism in miR-146a?
Higher cIMT is significantly associated with large-artery atherosclerosis ischemic stroke, and this risk is further modified by the rs2910164 polymorphism in miR-146a.
cIMT may refine large-artery stroke risk assessment in practice; leaves open gene–cIMT interactions for prospective confirmation.
Background: Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) has been associated with an elevated risk of ischemic stroke (IS) in several studies, but the results are inconsistent. We investigated whether the association between cIMT and IS varied across different IS subtypes, and further assessed gene–cIMT interactions’ association with IS risk. Methods: A total of 1048 IS cases (795 large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) cases, 103 small-vessel occlusion (SVO) cases, and 150 other subtypes) and 2696 IS-free controls across 2179 families were included in the analysis. Self-reported IS cases were confirmed through medical records’ review and head imaging by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. The mean values of the common cIMT obtained in bilateral distal and proximal carotid artery segments were used. The genotype information of rs2910164 polymorphism in microRNA-146a (miR-146a) was also collected. Results: We found that cIMT was significantly associated with a higher risk of IS and LAA subtype but not SVO subtype in the multivariate-adjusted models. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) in the highest quartile versus the lowest quartile of cIMT was 2.48 (1.92–3.20) for IS and 2.75 (2.08–3.64) for LAA (both p trend <0.001). The results also showed that there was a significant interaction between cIMT and rs2910164 genotype with the risk of IS (p interaction = 0.03) and LAA (p interaction = 0.02). The associations of cIMT with IS and LAA were strengthened among participants carried rs2910164_GG genotype compared with those with rs2910164_CC genotype. Conclusions: Our results indicate that higher cIMT levels were significantly associated with IS and LAA subtype but not SVO subtype, and the relations were modified by rs2910164 polymorphism in miR-146a.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: