Why the study?
Amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity occurs in 4-17% of cases and, if not diagnosed and treated early, may progress to pulmonary fibrosis and respiratory failure.
Does amiodarone discontinuation and steroid administration improve amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity in a patient on long-term amiodarone?
Does amiodarone discontinuation and steroid administration improve amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity in a patient on long-term amiodarone?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity can be successfully managed with drug discontinuation and steroids, emphasizing the need for baseline and ongoing pulmonary monitoring.
Amiodarone is an anti-arrhythmic drug widely used, but its administration can be associated with several adverse side-effects. Among these, amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity (APT) occurs in 4-17% of cases and, if not early diagnosed and treated, may evolve towards pulmonary fibrosis and respiratory failure. A 76 years-old-man went to the hospital for accidental trauma. The patient did not report respiratory symptoms but was suffering from atrial fibrillation treated with amiodarone 200 mg/day from three years (cumulative dose >150 gr). HRCT showed ground-glass opacities and nodules in both lungs. The patient underwent fibreoptic bronchoscopy with BAL. Cytologic examination of BALF sediment put in evidence foamy macrophages. The electronic microscopy revealed into the alveolar macrophages "… the presence of multilamellar intracytoplasmic bodies and lysosomes, loads of lipid material". LFTs showed a restrictive syndrome and an impairment of DLCO. Amiodarone discontinuation and steroid administration led to the regression of radiological lesions and the recovery of lung function. Patients taking amiodarone can experience APT. They should perform a basal chest x-ray with LFTs before starting therapy. Monitoring could reveal early the pulmonary toxicity, and patients can respond favourably to the treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terzo et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: