Why the study?
Existing risk indices used to estimate perioperative cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery were derived from observational studies that are now outdated.
Does the Updated Cardiac Risk Score (UCRS) accurately predict the 30-day risk of major cardiovascular complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery compared to established risk indices?
Does the Updated Cardiac Risk Score (UCRS) accurately predict the 30-day risk of major cardiovascular complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery compared to established risk indices?
The Updated Cardiac Risk Score (UCRS) is a simple, four-variable tool that accurately stratifies the 30-day risk of major cardiovascular complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May refine perioperative CV risk estimation in noncardiac surgery; leaves open superiority over established indices pending external validation.
In patients undergoing noncardiac surgery risk indices can estimate patients' perioperative risk of major cardiovascular complications. The indexes currently in use were derived from observational studies that are now outdated with respect to the current clinical context. We undertook a prospective, observational, cohort study to derive, validate, and compare a new risk index with established risk indices. We evaluated 7335 patients (mean age 63±13 years) who underwent noncardiac surgery. Based on prospective data analysis of 4600 patients (derivation cohort) we developed an Updated Cardiac Risk Score (UCRS), and validated the risk score on 2735 patients (validation cohort). Four variables (i.e. the UCRS) were significantly associated with the risk of a major perioperative cardiovascular events: high-risk surgery, preoperative estimate glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, age ≥75 years, and history of heart failure. Based on the UCRS we created risk classes 1,2,3 and 4 and their corresponding 30-day risk of a major cardiovascular complication was 0.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5-1.7], 2.5 (95% CI 1.6-5.6), 8.7 (95% CI 5.2-18.9) and 27.2 (95% CI 11.8-50.3), respectively. No significant differences were found between the derivation and validation cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrate a high predictive performance of the new index, with greater power to discriminate between the various classes of risk than the indexes currently used. The high predictive performance and simplicity of the UCRS make it suitable for wide-scale use in preoperative cardiac risk assessment of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scorcu et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: