Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, two different L-band digital aeronautical communication systems (L-DACS), i.e., L-DACS1 and L-DACS2, have been proposed as two future communication infrastructure candidates for air-to-ground (AG) communication systems, with L-DACS1 selected as the best candidate. In this paper, we describe a filter bank multicarrier (FBMC)-based communication system and show its advantages over the L-DACS systems. We provide simulation results for all three communication systems to fairly compare their power spectral density, peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR), and bit error ratio (BER) performance. We show that in a measurement-based AG communication channel model, FBMC has better performance (and spectral containment) than the L-DACS schemes, and this is particularly true in the presence of actual interfering signals from distance measuring equipment (DME). Simulation results show that FBMC can substantially reduce the out-of-band power and can suppress DME interference by at least 19.5 dB, due to its well-localized subcarrier prototype filters. FBMC can also increase throughput and spectral efficiency by reducing the number of guard-band subcarriers and removal of the cyclic prefix, postfix, as well as windowing techniques used in L-DACS1. These results show that an FBMC-based communication system can be an appealing candidate for future AG communication systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamal et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: