Why the study?
EV-D68 is an emerging pathogen causing severe respiratory and neurological disease that hijacks host translation machinery, but the specific mechanisms remained to be defined.
EV-D68 hijacks host translation machinery by cleaving LARP1 and PABPC1, highlighting these host proteins as potential targets for antiviral interventions.
EV-D68 protease cleavage of LARP1/PABPC1 may aid replication; leaves open antiviral targets for AFM and severe respiratory disease.
Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is an emerging pathogen associated with severe respiratory diseases and neurological complications, such as acute flaccid myelitis. EV-D68 has developed sophisticated mechanisms to hijack host translation machinery, facilitating its replication and impairing host mRNA translation. In this study, we demonstrate that EV-D68 cleaves La-related protein 1 (LARP1) and poly(A)-binding protein cytoplasmic 1 (PABPC1) through its proteases 3Cpro and 2Apro. Our results indicate that overexpressing LARP1 and PABPC1 significantly inhibits EV-D68 replication and reduces the virus-mediated suppression of host translation. While both LARP1 and PABPC1 regulate translation, they exert antiviral effects through distinct mechanisms. We found that LARP1 interacts with the 5'UTR of EV-D68 RNA through its LAM domain, and this interaction is crucial for its antiviral function. LARP1 translation modulation is also influenced by the mTOR and CDK1 signaling pathways. Viral infection inhibits mTOR and CDK1 phosphorylation, which enhances LARP1's binding to viral RNA and inhibits viral translation. To counteract this inhibition, EV-D68 cleaves LARP1 through 3Cpro, thereby promoting efficient viral translation. We also investigated other enteroviruses, such as EV-A71 and CV-A16, which similarly target LARP1 and PABPC1, indicating a conserved mechanism across enteroviruses. Our findings offer new insights into how EV-D68 manipulates host translation and highlight the potential of targeting LARP1 and PABPC1 for antiviral interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: