Why the study?
Does radiofrequency ablation provide procedural success and long-term freedom from arrhythmia in patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia with and without arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy?
Does radiofrequency ablation provide procedural success and long-term freedom from arrhythmia in patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia with and without arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy?
Radiofrequency ablation is effective for treating idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia, providing high rates of long-term freedom from arrhythmia and symptomatic relief regardless of the presence of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy.
Supports ablation for idiopathic VA regardless of AIC; extends observational data but leaves open randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a study to assess the procedural success and long-term freedom from arrhythmia in patients treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia (VA) with and without arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC). DESIGN: We identified 131 patients treated with RFA for idiopathic VA in our institution; 16 of whom had AIC. Data were obtained from patient files. A questionnaire was used to assess the improvement in subjective symptoms late after RFA. RESULTS: At the initial RFA, any VA was abolished in 93 patients (71%), non-targeted VA still was observed in 5 patients (4%), and the targeted VA remained present in 29 (22%). In 4 patients (3%) procedural success was undeterminable. During a median follow-up time of 8 months after latest RFA, 100 patients (76%) stayed free from recurrence. We observed no difference in procedural or long-term success between patients with and without AIC. When excluding patients with fascicular ventricular tachycardia (VT), a significantly higher proportion of patients with AIC had VA originating from the left ventricle (p = 0.027). Patients with AIC had a significant improvement of ejection fraction after RFA (p < 0.001). Totally 89 of 99 patients (90%) who returned the questionnaire reported symptomatic benefit a median of 64 months after their latest procedure. CONCLUSIONS: RFA is effective for treating idiopathic VA with and without AIC, with high rates of long-term freedom from VA and symptomatic relief. We found more patients with AIC had left ventricle VA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mørk et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: