Why the study?
Does continuous intravenous infusion of low-dose landiolol reduce heart rate in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and rapid atrial fibrillation?
Does continuous intravenous infusion of low-dose landiolol reduce heart rate in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and rapid atrial fibrillation?
Low-dose landiolol safely and effectively reduces heart rate in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and rapid atrial fibrillation without causing hypotension.
Low-dose landiolol was associated with HR reduction without hypotension in acute decompensated HF with AF; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: Recently, we reported that low-dose landiolol (1.5 µg·kg(-1)·min(-1)), an ultra-short-acting β-blocker, safely decreased the heart rate (HR) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and sinus tachycardia, thereby improving cardiac function. We investigated whether low-dose landiolol effectively decreased the HR in ADHF patients with rapid atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We enrolled 23 ADHF patients with rapid AF (HR ≥120 beats·min(-1) and New York Heart Association class III-IV) and systolic heart failure (SHF: n = 12) or diastolic heart failure (DHF: n = 11) who received conventional therapy with diuretics, vasodilators, and/or low-dose inotropes. They were administered continuous intravenous infusion of low-dose landiolol (1.0-2.0 µg·kg(-1)·min(-1)), and their electrocardiograms and blood pressures were monitored for 24 h thereafter. RESULTS: Two hours after starting landiolol, the HR was reduced significantly (22%), without a reduction in blood pressure, and remained constant thereafter. The HR reduction 2 h after landiolol administration was significantly greater in the DHF group than in the SHF group. No incidence of hypotension was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Digitalis or amiodarone is currently recommended for HR control in ADHF patients with rapid AF. Our results showed that continuous infusion of low-dose landiolol may also be useful as first-line therapy in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: