Why the study?
Does biochemical analysis of CK-MB in pericardial fluid provide high diagnostic efficacy for the post-mortem diagnosis of myocardial infarction in autopsy cases?
Does biochemical analysis of CK-MB in pericardial fluid provide high diagnostic efficacy for the post-mortem diagnosis of myocardial infarction in autopsy cases?
CK-MB levels in pericardial fluid can serve as a sensitive marker with high negative predictive value for the post-mortem diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
Pericardial CK-MB may aid autopsy MI diagnosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before forensic adoption.
Sudden cardiac death due to acute myocardial infarction is the most prevalent cause of death in adults and constitutes a significant portion of the autopsies that are conducted by Forensic pathologists.Serum cardiac isoenzymes Creatine phosphokinase-MB (CK-MB) has high sensitivity and specificity for cardiac damage and routinely used for clinical diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI).However, in Forensic Medicine, diagnostic utility of this cardiac marker for post-mortem diagnosis of MI has not been fully established.Present study is carried out with aim to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CK-MB in pericardial fluid for autopsy diagnosis of MI.This study included 119 medico-legal autopsy cases selected during a period of two years.Four study groups were formed depending upon final cause of death Biochemical analysis of pericardial fluid was carried out.Highest levels of CK-MB were noted in deaths due to IHD.By this cardiac marker, early infarcts can be predicted in sudden cardiac deaths associated with severe coronary artery disease & inconclusive histopathological findings.We obtained high diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value of CPK-MB for autopsy diagnosis of MI in pericardial fluid comparable to the clinical analyses on serum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghormade et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: