Why the study?
Complications such as AF, sternal wound infection, and cardiac decompensation occur after cardiac surgery, but whether remote monitoring via mHealth improves their early detection compared to standard care is unknown.
Does a multi-device mHealth remote monitoring intervention improve the detection rate of atrial fibrillation in patients after cardiac surgery compared to standard care?
Does a multi-device mHealth remote monitoring intervention improve the detection rate of atrial fibrillation in patients after cardiac surgery compared to standard care?
This study protocol outlines a prospective cohort study with historical controls to evaluate whether a multi-device mHealth intervention improves the early detection of atrial fibrillation and other complications after cardiac surgery.
mHealth doubles POAF detection post-cardiac surgery; leaves open whether this improves outcomes or should change practice.
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF), sternal wound infection, and cardiac decompensation are complications that can occur after cardiac surgery. Early detection of these complications is clinically relevant, as early treatment is associated with better clinical outcomes. Remote monitoring with the use of a smartphone (mobile health [mHealth]) might improve the early detection of complications after cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this study is to compare the detection rate of AF diagnosed with an mHealth solution to the detection rate of AF diagnosed with standard care. Secondary objectives include detection of sternal wound infection and cardiac decompensation, as well as assessment of quality of life, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS The Box 2.0 is a study with a prospective intervention group and a historical control group for comparison. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery at Leiden University Medical Center are eligible for enrollment. In this study, 365 historical patients will be used as controls and 365 other participants will be asked to receive either The Box 2.0 intervention consisting of seven home measurement devices along with a video consultation 2 weeks after discharge or standard cardiac care for 3 months. Patient information will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The Box 2.0 devices include a blood pressure monitor, thermometer, weight scale, step count watch, single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) device, 12-lead ECG device, and pulse oximeter. RESULTS The study started in November 2018. The primary outcome of this study is the detection rate of AF in both groups. Quality of life is measured with the five-level EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Cost-effectiveness is calculated from a society perspective using prices from Dutch costing guidelines and quality of life data from the study. In the historical cohort, 93.9% (336/358) completed the EQ-5D-5L and patient satisfaction questionnaires 3 months after cardiac surgery. CONCLUSIONS The rationale and design of a study to investigate mHealth devices in postoperative cardiac surgery patients are presented. The first results are expected in September 2020. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03690492; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03690492 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/16326
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biersteker et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: