Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: To assess the feasibility, safety, and preliminary subjective and clinical benefit of integrating Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Therapy (NMRT; MBST®) into a multimodal treatment and rehabilitation protocol in musculoskeletal injuries in elite-level football players. Methods: A retrospective extended case series was conducted at Hamburger Sport-Verein (HSV) during the 2024-25 season. Thirteen male first-team footballers (aged 19–29) sustaining various acute/chronic muscle, tendon, ligament, and bone injuries were treated in addition to standard-of-care rehabilitation (combination therapy) with daily 60-minute NMRT sessions (7-10 x). Subjective and overall clinical results, re-injury occurrence, safety profile and adverse events were collected over 12 months. Injury prevalence and incidence in elite European football were contextualized using established data sources. Key Results: In the HSV case series, all 13 players achieved timely and sustained return to full training and matches, with zero re-injuries and no reported side effects. NMRT was well tolerated and easily integrated into existing physiotherapy and recovery routines. Conclusions: Combination therapy is the cornerstone of treating elite athletes, who require a multifaceted approach to treatment that addresses their unique needs and ensures they receive the best possible care. Combining NMRT with standard multimodal therapy appears to be a safe, well-accepted, and potentially effective adjunct in sustainable rehabilitation of typical elite football injuries. While promising in this single-club case reports, controlled trials are essential to quantify NMRT’s additive benefit and establish standardized treatment protocols in sports medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schreiner et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: