Why the study?
Do coagulation activation markers (TpP, D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2, TAT) help diagnose or exclude proximal deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in Emergency Department patients?
Do coagulation activation markers (TpP, D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2, TAT) help diagnose or exclude proximal deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in Emergency Department patients?
TpP and TAT ELISA tests demonstrate 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value for excluding proximal deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients.
May support ruling out PDVT/PE with TpP/TAT ELISA in ED; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
We examined various nonSTAT commercially available coagulation activation markers in an attempt to help diagnose or exclude the often subtle clinical presentations of proximal deep vein thrombosis (PDVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Fifty-five patients presenting to the Emergency Department were completely assessed. Eleven patients were diagnosed with PDVT, six patients were diagnosed with PE, and three patients were diagnosed with both PDVT and PE. Thrombus precursor protein (TpP) excluded the diagnosis in 19 of the 35 patients negative for PDVT and/or PE, D-Dimer in 15 patients, prothrombin fragment 1.2 in 17 patients, and thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) in 14 patients. Both the TpP and TAT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests had 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value for evaluating PDVT and/or PE. The TpP ELISA had the highest specificity (54%) of all four markers studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lacapra et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: