Why the study?
Does the change in BNP levels at 3 months predict clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with advanced heart failure?
Does the change in BNP levels at 3 months predict clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with advanced heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An increase in BNP levels 3 months after CRT implantation is a strong predictor of poor clinical response, including death, need for transplantation, or LVAD implantation.
The authors used brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) as a reliable marker to identify nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with advanced heart failure. The study included 70 patients with left ventricular dysfunction (mean ejection fraction, 21+/-4%) and left bundle branch block (QRS duration, 164+/-25 milliseconds) treated with CRT. The authors reviewed data on New York Heart Association functional class, baseline ejection fraction, sodium, creatinine, QRS duration, and BNP levels 3 months before and after CRT therapy. The authors compared results of 42 patients who survived (973+/-192 days) after CRT implantation (responders) to those of 28 patients (nonresponders) who either expired (n=21) or underwent heart transplantation (n=5) or left ventricular assist device implantation (n=2) after an average of 371+/-220 days. Mean BNP levels after 3 months of CRT decreased in responders from 758+/-611 pg/mL to 479+/-451 pg/mL (P=.044), while in nonresponders there was increase in BNP levels from 1191+/-466 pg/mL to 1611+/-1583; P=.046. A rise in BNP levels was associated with poor response (death or need for transplantation or left ventricular assist device and impaired long-term outcome), which makes it a good predictor to identify such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delgado et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: