Why the study?
A significant proportion of patients with advanced heart failure and QRS prolongation do not benefit from CRT implantation, motivating evaluation of NT-pro BNP and cTnThs as predictors of CRT response.
Do serial measurements of NT-proBNP and cTnThs predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure?
Do serial measurements of NT-proBNP and cTnThs predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure?
Serial measurements of NT-proBNP, but not high sensitivity troponin T, can effectively monitor and predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a valuable intracardiac device--based treatment option for a subgroup of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) and QRS prolongation. However, still a significant proportion of patients do not benefit from CRT implantation, labeled as non-responders. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) and high sensitivity troponin T (cTnThs) value as predictors of CRT response in a 12-month observation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 46 patients with HF and implanted CRT-D. Levels of NT-pro BNP and cTnThs were assessed during a 12 month follow up. RESULTS: 46 consecutive patients (76% men) with a mean age of 64±8 were observed for 12 months. The CRT response criteria was met by 26 patients (56,5%). A significant decline in the NT-pro BNP concentrations was documented in responders (p=0.001). Moreover, ΔNT-pro BNP by at least 579 pg/ml had high sensitivity and specificity for identifying the CRT responders. There were no statistically significant differences in the results of cTnThs between the two study groups. CONCLUSION: The relative change in the level of NT-pro BNP by at least 43,5% allows to identify the responders to CRT after 12 months of follow-up. Serial measurements of NT-pro BNP can be a valuable tool for monitoring the effectiveness of CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dębska-Kozłowska et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: