Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve prognosis across different baseline NT-proBNP levels in patients with heart failure and cardiac dyssynchrony?
RCT (n=813)
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve prognosis across different baseline NT-proBNP levels in patients with heart failure and cardiac dyssynchrony?
NT-proBNP retains its prognostic value in heart failure patients receiving CRT, and the relative benefit of CRT is consistent regardless of baseline NT-proBNP levels.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CRT benefit may extend across NT-proBNP strata in HF with dyssynchrony; extends observational data but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
AIMS: The Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure (CARE-HF) study showed that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality in HF patients with markers of dyssynchrony. Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) might predict which patients benefit most from CRT. We evaluated whether the prognostic value of NT-proBNP was influenced by CRT and the effects of CRT stratified according to NT-proBNP. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 813 patients were enrolled in CARE-HF. Baseline log-transformed NT-proBNP independently predicted all-cause mortality, sudden death, and death from pump failure. In a multivariable model including log-transformed NT-proBNP, assignment to CRT remained independently associated with better prognosis without evidence of interaction. Stratifying patients according to the median NT-proBNP and to CRT treatment allocation, all-cause mortality was 12% if or= median + CRT, and 51% if >or= median + control group. There was no evidence of a difference in the relative effect of CRT across different values of NT-proBNP. CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP retains its prognostic value in HF patients with CRT. Deploying CRT before the patients have reached end-stage HF may maximize the benefit of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berger et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with markers of cardiac dyssynchrony (n=813). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vs. Control group was evaluated on All-cause mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: