The interaction between the region of residues 4820-4841 adjacent to the channel pore and the 96 kDa segment containing residues 4114-4142 is involved in the mechanism of Ca2+-dependent channel regulation of the Ryanodine receptor.
Identifies key residues for Ca2+-dependent RyR gating; leaves open whether this domain can be targeted in channelopathies.
Ryanodine receptor (RyR) mutations linked with some congenital skeletal and cardiac diseases are localized to three easily definable regions: region 1 (N-terminal domain), region 2 (central domain), and a rather broad region 3 containing the channel pore. As shown in our recent studies, the interdomain interaction between regions 1 and 2 plays a critical role in channel regulation and pathogenesis. Here we present evidence that within region 3 there is a similar channel regulation mechanism mediated by an interdomain interaction. DP15, a peptide corresponding to RyR1 residues 4820-4841, produced significant activation of [3H]ryanodine binding above threshold Ca2+ concentrations (>or=0.3 microM), but MH mutations (L4823P or L4837V) made in DP15 almost completely abolished its channel activating function. To identify the DP15 binding site(s) within RyR1, DP15 (labeled with a fluorescent probe Alexa Fluor 680 and a photoaffinity cross-linker APG) was cross-linked to RyR1, and the site of cross-linking was identified by gel analysis of fluorescently labeled proteolytic fragments with the aid of Western blotting with site-specific antibodies. The shortest fluorescently labeled band was a 96 kDa fragment which was stained with an antibody directed to the region of residues 4114-4142 of RyR1, indicating that the interaction between the region of residues 4820-4841 adjacent to the channel pore and the 96 kDa segment containing the region of residues 4114-4142 is involved in the mechanism of Ca2+-dependent channel regulation. In further support of this concept, anti-DP15 antibody and cardiac counterpart of DP15 produced channel activation similar to that of DP15.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamada et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: