Why the study?
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduce cognitive decline compared to conventional CABG in elderly patients?
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduce cognitive decline compared to conventional CABG in elderly patients?
This editorial highlights that off-pump CABG does not appear to reduce postoperative cognitive decline compared to conventional CABG in elderly patients.
n this issue of Circulation, Jensen et al 1 report that cognitive difficulties were no fewer when off-pump (OPCAB) versus conventional (CCAB) coronary artery bypass grafting was used. This important investigation, a substudy of the Best Bypass Surgery Trial, is a randomized prospective controlled trial that compares OPCAB with CCAB. Although the numbers seem relatively small (ie, 120 elderly patients with a men age of 76 years), the study was carefully powered to show differences in cognitive function at a mean of 103 days of follow-up. Although one could quibble with the details of the neuropsychological tests chosen (mini-mental state examination as a screening test for dementia after randomization but before inclusion, visual verbal learning, concept shifting, Stroop color word interference test, letter-digit coding), the main result is unequivocal. The incidence of cognitive decline was roughly 8%, and no difference between OPCAB and CCAB was found. This disappointing result raises important questions about the mechanisms of neurological injury caused by cardiac surgery and what future strategies might entail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin A. Samuels (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: