Why the study?
What is the incidence and extent of cerebral damage following open-heart surgery?
What is the incidence and extent of cerebral damage following open-heart surgery?
Open-heart surgery frequently causes subclinical brain damage detectable by psychometric and biochemical methods, suggesting routine neurologic exams are insufficiently sensitive.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Routine exams may miss frequent subclinical cerebral damage post-surgery; leaves open whether psychometric screening improves outcomes.
The incidence and extent of cerebral damage following open-heart surgery were prospectively investigated in 103 patients, using clinical assessment, psychometry, adenylate kinase analysis in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF-AK) and computed tomography (CT) of the brain. The surgical mortality was 1.9%. Clinically there was obvious cerebral dysfunction in four cases, subtle evidence of brain damage (mainly undue fatigue) in 16 and no evidence in 81 cases. In the 16 patients the mean CSF-AK was substantially increased (0.122 U/l) and the psychometric performance distinctly impaired (-12 points) postoperatively; in the 81 patients the figures were 0.55 U/l and -3.4. Psychometrically, 60% of the patients showed cerebral dysfunction, which was pronounced in 16%. CSF-AK analysis indicated cerebral damage as absent or trival in 45%, moderate in 33% and marked in 22%. CT revealed postoperative cerebral infarction in two cases. Results from the various methods showed reasonable correlation, but also considerable overlap. Open-heart surgery thus can cause brain damage additional to that neurologically discernible. Fatigue is an important sign in this context. In research on postoperative brain damage, the relative insensitivity of routine neurologic investigation calls for supplementary, refined methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Åberg et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: