Why the study?
Does the proposed processing improve the robustness of PPV calculation during major abdominal surgery compared to existing algorithms?
Does the proposed processing improve the robustness of PPV calculation during major abdominal surgery compared to existing algorithms?
A novel signal processing approach improves the robustness of arterial pulse pressure variation calculations during the dynamic hemodynamic changes of major surgery.
May enhance PPV robustness throughout surgery; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: Arterial pulse pressure variation (PPV) is widely used for predicting fluid responsiveness and supporting fluid management in the operating room and intensive care unit. Available PPV algorithms have been typically validated for fluid responsiveness during episodes of hemodynamic stability. Yet, little is known about the performance of PPV algorithms during surgery, where fast changes of the blood pressure may affect the robustness of the presented PPV value. This work provides a comprehensive understanding of how various existing algorithmic designs affect the robustness of the presented PPV value during surgery, and proposes additional processing for the pulse pressure signal before calculating PPV. APPROACH: We recorded arterial blood pressure waveforms from 23 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. To evaluate the performance, we designed three clinically relevant metrics. Main results and Significance: The results show that all algorithms performed well during episodes of hemodynamic stability. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the proposed processing helps improve the robustness of PPV during the entire course of surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: