Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intrapericardial implantation of an ICD through the transverse sinus is a feasible alternative technique for small children that may reduce complications compared to epicardial or subcutaneous ICDs.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) can be a crucial therapeutic modality for pediatric patients with congenital heart disease, Brugada syndrome, long QT syndrome and cardiomyopathy. Because transvenous implantation of ICD is mostly unfeasible for pediatric patients due to anatomical and technical limitations, epicardial patch type or subcutaneous type ICD have been used. Implantation of these alternative ICDs, however, was reported to be frequently associated with significant complications. We report a case of successful intrapericardial implantation of a single coil-type ICD through the transverse sinus in a 27 month-old child weighing lesser than 10 kg, and it was inferred from this experience that this alternative technique may decrease complications and morbidities after ICD implantation in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seong et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: