Why the study?
Does transcatheter closure of PDA improve aortic stiffness index and cardiovascular function in children with hemodynamically significant PDA?
Does transcatheter closure of PDA improve aortic stiffness index and cardiovascular function in children with hemodynamically significant PDA?
Transcatheter closure of PDA in children normalizes LVEF and significantly reduces aortic stiffness, although ASI remains higher than in healthy controls at 6 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PDA closure reduces aortic stiffness without normalization at 6 months; leaves open its value for guiding timing or predicting outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Patent ductus arteriosus is generally associated with hyperdynamic status. Given the vascular shunt between the aorta and pulmonary artery, intrinsic aortic changes occur (aortic stiffness). In the present study, we attempted to assess the impact of PDA on aortic stiffness and its connection with cardiovascular function before and after transcatheter closure of PDA. PATIENT AND METHODS: Our study consisted of 60 children who were preparing for transcatheter closure of PDA and 60 healthy controls. All patients had clinical and echocardiographic proof of hemodynamically significant PDA. RESULTS: Patients with PDA exhibited significantly higher ASI than controls before closure (p-value < 0.05). After closure, ASI was significantly reduced (p-value < 0.05), but still higher than that of controls (p-value < 0.05) at the six-month follow-up assessment. Patients with PDA had significantly lower LVEF than controls before closure (p-value < 0.05). After closure, LVEF was significantly enhanced (p-value < 0.05), and no significant difference was noted amongst patients and controls (p-value < 0.05) at the six-month follow-up assessment. CONCLUSION: Aortic stiffness is significantly increased in patients with PDA regardless of PDA size. Aortic stiffness is related to reduced heart function. ASI may be valuable for observing the course of patients with PDA before and after intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elsaughier et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: