Why the study?
Does the ImmuliteTurbo cTnI assay provide comparable performance to the original Immulite assay for detecting cTnI?
Does the ImmuliteTurbo cTnI assay provide comparable performance to the original Immulite assay for detecting cTnI?
The ImmuliteTurbo cTnI assay offers a faster 15-minute turnaround time with comparable diagnostic performance to the original 45-minute assay.
OBJECTIVES: An analytical and clinical evaluation of cTnI on the ImmuliteTurbo system with 15 min assay time compared to 45 min with the original Immulite assay is presented. METHODS AND DESIGN: Detection limit, functional sensitivity, AMI decision limit, assay linearity, influence of sample material (serum, heparin, citrate and EDTA plasma), interference, analytical and clinical method comparison studies were performed. RESULTS: Functional sensitivity (at CV 20%) was 0.35 compared to 0.23 microg/L for the original assay. AMI decision limit (99th percentile of a reference control group) was 0.48 microg/L for both assays. In patients with acute coronary syndromes, chronic renal failure or pulmonary embolism the assays showed concordant results in 87.2-96.5%. Differing results were only found around the cut-off level and were attributed to assay imprecision. CONCLUSION: The new assay is sensitive for the determination of cTnI, shows comparable results to the original assay version and is easy to perform within 15 min.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peetz et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: