Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of depletion of macrophages and/or natural killer (NK) cells on islet xenograft rejection in the pig-to-mouse model. Five microliters (4,000 to 5,000 IEQ, islet equivalents) of adult pig islets were transplanted under the renal capsule of C57BL/6 mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Macrophages were depleted by injection of liposome-encapsulated dichloromethylene diphosphonate (Lip-Cl2MDP) intraperitoneally (i.p.) at a dose of 100 microl/ 10 g body weight (BW) 2 days before transplantation, and 50 microl/10 g BW weekly thereafter. NK cells were depleted by injection of the monoclonal antibody NK 1.1 (anti-NK 1.1 mAb) i.p. at a dose of 100 microg/mouse 1 day before transplantation, and then 25 microg per week thereafter. Islet graft survival was monitored by daily measurements of blood glucose. Graft survival was 8 +/- 1.2 days in untreated controls, 9 +/- 1.0 days with anti-NK 1.1 mAb alone, 22 +/- 4.9 days with Lip-Cl2MDP alone (P<0.01 vs. controls), and 26 +/- 3.8 days with Lip-Cl2MDP plus anti-NK 1.1 mAb (P<0.01 vs. controls). In the last group, two of six animals were killed with functioning grafts 30 days after transplantation. In untreated controls, rejected xenografts were heavily infiltrated by F4/80+ macrophages and CD3+T cells. In Lip-Cl2MDP-treated groups, the number of F4/80+ macrophages was markedly reduced. On the periphery of xenografts, a small number of CD3+T cells were observed. In conclusion, our results suggest that strategies targeting macrophages may facilitate islet xenograft survival. A role for NK cells cannot be excluded, but appears to be of minor importance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: