Qualitative study reveals key drivers of engagement in student-led health checks among rural men, highlighting the value of community settings for preventive care.
Rural men in Australia experience poorer health outcomes compared to their urban counterparts, often due to barriers such as limited access to services, cultural norms around masculinity, and geographic isolation. This study explored the motivations underlying rural men’s participation in a student-led health promotion activity conducted by first-year paramedicine students at a large agricultural event. Using semi-structured verbal surveys with 60 participants, qualitative data were collected and analysed through an inductive content analysis approach. Three key themes were created to represent the reasons men engaged in the activity and the impact it had: factors that encouraged engagement and built trust, meeting multiple needs, and giving to student learning for the future. Participants were drawn to the activity by a welcoming environment, peer encouragement, and the consistent presence of health promotion at the event. Health promotion provided an opportunity for men to access basic health assessments, reflect on their wellbeing, and engage in conversations about physical and mental health in a supportive setting. Many participants also expressed a strong motivation to contribute to student learning, particularly through experiential interactions that allowed students to develop technical and interpersonal skills. The findings highlight the value of embedding health promotion activities in familiar, community-based settings and demonstrate the multitude of benefits for rural men. This research contributes to the growing evidence supporting innovative, community-engaged models of work-integrated learning that address health disparities while enhancing student education and rural workforce development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kernaghan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: