Laboratory study demonstrates that fluorocarbon-containing cryogenic plasmas boost dielectric etch selectivity over amorphous carbon by 2.5 times, highlighting improved semiconductor patterning.
In this study, the etching characteristics of SiO2, SiN, and amorphous carbon films processed in CF4/H2 and hydrogen fluoride (HF)/CF4 plasmas were investigated. In CF4/H2 plasmas, where HF is generated within the plasma, SiO2 cryogenic etching was primarily governed by ion-enhanced surface reactions driven by co-adsorbed HF/H2O species. However, under conditions where fluorocarbon deposition becomes dominant—such as high H2 concentration in CF4/H2 plasmas or low ion-energy regimes—the deposited fluorocarbon layer also plays a critical role in controlling the etching reactions. The SiN etch rate decreased with increasing H2 concentration in CF4/H2 plasma and lower temperature due to reduced CFx ions and F radical densities and the increased thermal stability of the ammonium fluorosilicate layer formed on the surface. For amorphous carbon films in CF4/H2 plasma, the etch rate decreased with increasing H2 concentration and transitioned from etching to net deposition once a critical H2 concentration was exceeded as a result of hydrogen-induced fluorine scavenging. In HF/CF4 plasmas, where HF is externally supplied, the SiO2 etch rate was insensitive to the CF4 addition when its concentration was below 20%, indicating a usable process window for fine-tuning selectivity without sacrificing throughput. In contrast, the addition of CF4 increased the SiN etch rate due to the reduced ammonium fluorosilicate formation and/or enhanced its removal, presumably facilitated by HF dilution and CFx species. For amorphous carbon films, the etch rate exhibited a minimum with a small amount of CF4 addition, suggesting that fluorocarbon radical deposition characteristics are a key factor governing etch suppression. Notably, adding a small amount of fluorocarbon to cryogenic HF plasma enhanced the selectivity of both SiO2 and SiN over amorphous carbon by approximately 2.5 times, respectively, without compromising etching throughput.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: